0 registered members (),
208
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums69
Topics113,611
Posts1,341,246
Members1,804
|
Most Online731 Jan 14th, 2020
|
|
|
Politics
#1547942
28/08/2015 09:37
28/08/2015 09:37
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,095 Berkshire
AnnieMac
OP
Enjoying the ride
|
OP
Enjoying the ride
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,095
Berkshire
|
I know that it's probably not a good idea to discuss politics with potential new friends, and for this reason I was going to say nothing after reading the thread about the general election. However, after sleeping on it I feel I must draw to your attention the fact that our government is currently waging war on the sick and the disabled, and nobody seems to care. The DWP's own figures show that 4,000 people DIED within 6 weeks of having their benefits stopped because they were assessed as being "fit for work". We are all only an accident or a serious illness away from needing state help. There may well be a few who manage to wangle this help when there is not much wrong with them, but the actual rate of fraud is 0.01% and this includes mistakes by the DWP. Unfortunately it is these cases of fraud which are highly publicised, and the notion of "scroungers" has resulted in a huge rise in hate crime against the disabled. Our government has put a psychopath, Iain Duncan Smith, in charge of so-called benefit "reforms" and the system of sanctions is causing untold mysery, with people having their money stopped for the most unfair of reasons, for example, a man who had a heart attack during an assessment who was put down as a no-show, and another who missed an appointment to attend his mother's funeral. We are presented with benefits claimants on TV as if they are all these grotesque characters who do not deserve any sympathy, but do we really want to live in a country where a woman with children whose husband leaves her becomes destitute and homeless, or where suicide becomes an attractive option for people who genuinely cannot work? I'm afraid that I agree with Nye Bevan, who called the Tories "lower than vermin". What a shame that their rich chums control the media and so the evil that they are doing is not widely known. Austerity is a complete smoke-screen for the ideologically-driven dismantling of the welfare state, and if this is what you really want, please continue to vote Tory.
|
|
|
Re: Politics
[Re: AnnieMac]
#1547947
28/08/2015 11:23
28/08/2015 11:23
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,731 Surrey
Emjay
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,731
Surrey
|
My views on the PM and this government are probably unprintable.
However:
a) The DWP's own figures show that 4,000 people DIED within 6 weeks of having their benefits stopped because they were assessed as being "fit for work".
Assuming this figure is correct, is there a correlation? I am sure over the years lots of people have died within 6 weeks of playing the National Lottery
b) the actual rate of fraud is 0.01% and this includes mistakes by the DWP
Mistakes by the DWP would not be fraud, so that is a bit odd. Also, is this the rate at which fraud is discovered or the assumed rate it is at (which would be a complete guess). If the belief is that only 1 in 10,000 are economical with the actualité when claiming benefits, I would struggle to reconcile that with personal experience.
c) a huge rise in hate crime against the disabled.
In 2014 there was a drop in the number of people convicted for disability hate crimes.
An increase in convictions can be seen as a problem. A drop in convictions can be seen as a problem and there is then a drive to encourage reporting and prosecution. For example, when the local ne'er-do-well swiped some old bathroom furniture from our drive the police were obliged to explore whether it might have been a hate crime with me.
Either way - drop in convictions, increase in convictions - it can be used as a political football.
Does our law condemn a man without first hearing him to find out what he has been doing? (John 7:51)
|
|
|
Re: Politics
[Re: AnnieMac]
#1547960
28/08/2015 13:46
28/08/2015 13:46
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,144 Southampton, Hants
Roadking
Club member 1809
|
Club member 1809
Forum is my life
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,144
Southampton, Hants
|
please continue to vote Tory. Thanks, Annie, although to be fair I probably would have anyway
"RK's way seems the most sensible to me". ali_hire 16 Dec 2010
|
|
|
Re: Politics
[Re: Roadking]
#1547966
28/08/2015 14:38
28/08/2015 14:38
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,988 Sunny Darlo
Wishy
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,988
Sunny Darlo
|
please continue to vote Tory. Thanks, Annie, although to be fair I probably would have anyway Taking that out of context helps reinforce the points above regarding selective statistics. Lovely to see all sides are in agreement on a topic like this. GROUP HUG
Up yours Photobucket.
|
|
|
Re: Politics
[Re: AnnieMac]
#1547988
28/08/2015 17:24
28/08/2015 17:24
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,731 Surrey
Emjay
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,731
Surrey
|
Er, yes they could, unless we are saying it is not possible for those fit for work to die.
Does our law condemn a man without first hearing him to find out what he has been doing? (John 7:51)
|
|
|
Re: Politics
[Re: AnnieMac]
#1548156
01/09/2015 09:44
01/09/2015 09:44
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546 Northumberland
AndrewR
I AM a Coop
|
I AM a Coop
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546
Northumberland
|
I don't think many people doubt that the system is broken, but it's impossible to draw any firm conclusions from the data the DWP released.
The department performs fortnightly checks to ensure that people in receipt of benefits are still alive (which I'm sure we'd all agree is sensible, nobody's arguing in favour of benefits for the dead) and the data released show the number of people were flagged as deceased within 6 weeks of being assessed fit for work.
However, a percentage of those people would have died within that time frame anyway, but without knowing how many assessments were carried out and how many were deemed fit for work it's impossible to determine if those assessed fit were more likely to die than those not, or than the general population as a whole.
The point is that if you pick any event - renewing your Sky subscription, buying a new car, taking up lion taming - then a certain number of people will die within 6 weeks of doing it, but that doesn't give you enough data for a post hoc presumption of a causal link.
The DWP have, I would suggest, carefully and cynically released exactly the information they were asked for in the knowledge that, despite the headline figures, it didn't prove anything.
Dear monos, a secret truth.
|
|
|
Re: Politics
[Re: AnnieMac]
#1548184
01/09/2015 23:19
01/09/2015 23:19
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 416 uk
OnlyItalian
Enjoying the ride
|
Enjoying the ride
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 416
uk
|
The clue is in the word "politics". "poly" meaning "many" and "tics" meaning "blood sucking parasites"!
"Proud owner of LE141 and a 99 VIS broomie "
|
|
|
Re: Politics
[Re: AndrewR]
#1549475
15/09/2015 02:10
15/09/2015 02:10
|
Enforcer
Unregistered
|
Enforcer
Unregistered
|
The DWP have, I would suggest, carefully and cynically released exactly the information they were asked for in the knowledge that, despite the headline figures, it didn't prove anything.
... except that they have something to hide.
|
|
|
|