Fiat Coupe Forum
- Founded by Kayjey & James Northam
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net


» External data
    owners listed
 
Who's Online Now
3 registered members (Coupe1, Sandhurst, Jamiepm), 224 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums69
Topics113,627
Posts1,341,366
Members1,807
Most Online731
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,568
stan 32,122
Theresa 23,303
PeteP 21,521
bockers 21,071
JimO 17,917
Nigel 17,367
Edinburgh 16,834
RSS Feeds
Club Events
Club Information
Track Events
Rolling Road/RWYB
Social Events
Non-UK Events
Coupé Related Chat
Coupé Spotting
Coupé News/Press
Buying/Selling Advice
Insuring a Coupé
Basic FAQ's
How to Guides
Forum Issues
Technical Problems
General Maintenance
Styling
Tuning
Handling
ICE and Alarm
Coupés for Sale
Coupés Wanted
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Group Buys
Business Forum
Other Vehicles for Sale/Wanted
Other Items for Sale/Wanted
Haggling/Offers
Ebay links
Other Cars
Other Websites
General Chat
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Highways Agency Gripe #1310049
25/01/2012 11:55
25/01/2012 11:55

T
Truffle
Unregistered
Truffle
Unregistered
T



As of last week, work has started on giving Bristol it's very own mini-m25. Where the M4 and M5 cross each other to the north west of the city the Highways Agency is created a section of what it calls 'Managed Motorways'.

Managed Motorways is Highways Agency Marketing speak for basically two changes:


  • Variable Speed Limit Cameras
  • Use of the Hard Shoulder


Now, the first of these, will be erected over the motorway in gantrys and, just like the M25 you'll have a specified speed limit, possibly just 30mph at times and a speed camera sitting there enforcing it.

My first problem with this is the amount labour that must go into monitoring the traffic flow and adjusting the speed on the cameras to match, means that the more they install these cameras, the more staff they need, the bigger their budget becomes etc, (jobs for the boys).

My second but larger gripe is with the hard shoulder idea. It's there so that incase of an accident, emergency vehicles can reach those who need help.

When do most accidents occur? Peak times.

When will the Hard shoulder be filled with slow moving or stationary vehicles? Peak times!

grr

Re: Highways Agency Gripe [Re: ] #1310069
25/01/2012 12:31
25/01/2012 12:31
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,159
,
S
samsite999 Offline
I AM a Coop
samsite999  Offline
I AM a Coop
S

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,159
,
Ill agree use of the hard shoulder is silly. I would rather sit in traffic for 20mins than them open up the hard shoulder for traffic.
I would expect little to no man hours are used to control the speed limits though? strikes me as something very easy to manage using a relativity simple counting/speed algorithm?

Re: Highways Agency Gripe [Re: ] #1310077
25/01/2012 12:58
25/01/2012 12:58
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 742
Midlands
Easy Offline
Enjoying the ride
Easy  Offline
Enjoying the ride

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 742
Midlands
They have done this to a little stretch on the M6 around where I live but I rarely see anyone keeping to the set speed limit. It has probably been about a year since they have gone live so are they all going to be getting tickets or do they know something I don't?

Re: Highways Agency Gripe [Re: ] #1310085
25/01/2012 13:13
25/01/2012 13:13
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Forum veteran
Nigel  Offline
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
It works brilliantly on the M42 - it creates an additional 33% capacity and IF there's an incident/accident, it's reverted back to three lanes instantly

The variable speed limits also work very well - it's far better to be travelling at a steady 40-50mph, than being allowed to reach 70+, only to create a concertina effect and then end up stationary for five minutes, for no apparent reason

The M42 was the pilot for this system and it has been SO succesful that it's being regarded as a model for other sections of motorway


[Linked Image]
Re: Highways Agency Gripe [Re: ] #1310099
25/01/2012 13:48
25/01/2012 13:48

T
Truffle
Unregistered
Truffle
Unregistered
T



So it's all YOUR fault Nigel grr

Re: Highways Agency Gripe [Re: ] #1310103
25/01/2012 13:52
25/01/2012 13:52
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 479
Northampton
srm6 Offline
Enjoying the ride
srm6  Offline
Enjoying the ride

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 479
Northampton
I had reservations when this was installed on the M6 up by Birmingham, but I have to say that it works well, and the queues have been less than they used to be.

Whether it justifies the disruption caused whilst doing the work is another matter....

Re: Highways Agency Gripe [Re: ] #1310107
25/01/2012 13:55
25/01/2012 13:55
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,852
Cambridge & Cotswolds
M
MeanRedSpider Offline
Je suis un Coupé
MeanRedSpider  Offline
Je suis un Coupé
M

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,852
Cambridge & Cotswolds
I'm with Nigel - I think the sections of motorway that I've been on with managed speed limits have generally been very effective. Monitoring is probably done largely automatically using the same sort of technology as TrafficMaster/Average Speed Cams use. I can't speak for hard shoulders but, if Stan is to be believed (at the extremes of possibility, I know) you don't want to stop on a hard shoulder anyway.

Re: Highways Agency Gripe [Re: ] #1310111
25/01/2012 14:01
25/01/2012 14:01
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,122
Cumbria
stan Offline
Dr. Frankenstan
stan  Offline
Dr. Frankenstan
Forum Demigod

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,122
Cumbria
They won't need extra staff for this Truffers, The control room staff simply set the limit via a touchscreen monitor and the cameras react to the input; if they set the limit to 40mph the camera recognises that.

There should also be "refuge" areas every 800m (from memory) designed to accommodate everything up to HGVs so that they can safely be worked on off the hard shoulder.

I did do a write up about this a few years ago because I was invited to give feedback at a planning meeting about this idea. My feedback was mainly negative, although I could see the advantages I could see the bigger dangers, as well as the smaller ones, for example the amount of debris that ends up on the hard shoulder is one of the reasons we had a speed limit for hard shoulder running due to the risk of punctures/debris strikes. I've lost count of the number of punctures I've picked up on the hard shoulder! At the time they said they'd be sweeping the shoulders more often but I wasn't convinced at all.

My biggest concern was how quickly motorists would respond if the shoulder was closed suddenly, especially if I was standing on it dealing with an incident!


[Linked Image]
Re: Highways Agency Gripe [Re: ] #1310125
25/01/2012 14:29
25/01/2012 14:29

T
Truffle
Unregistered
Truffle
Unregistered
T



Well it's going to take 2 years for the work to be completed (assuming it remains on schedule), so i'm sure that people will marvel at how free flowing the traffic is once work is completed.

Mainly because they've forgotten what the traffic was like before all the cones appeared.

Re: Highways Agency Gripe [Re: Nigel] #1310128
25/01/2012 14:36
25/01/2012 14:36

J
Jonny
Unregistered
Jonny
Unregistered
J



Originally Posted By: Nigel
It works brilliantly on the M42 - it creates an additional 33% capacity and IF there's an incident/accident, it's reverted back to three lanes instantly

The variable speed limits also work very well - it's far better to be travelling at a steady 40-50mph, than being allowed to reach 70+, only to create a concertina effect and then end up stationary for five minutes, for no apparent reason

The M42 was the pilot for this system and it has been SO succesful that it's being regarded as a model for other sections of motorway


Agreed, it's brilliant. Some days it was an average of 15-20mph during the evening rush. Now it's at least 50mph cool


Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 15 (0.006s) Memory: 0.7848 MB (Peak: 0.8801 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-11 18:59:42 UTC